From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:55:10 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <Xns9D5189EB419BSnarkCharmedImSure@188.40.43.213>
 	<hpddc6$csh$1@speranza.aioe.org> <wccwrwla003.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <602abc7e-afbe-4862-8885-b349ac4e6b90@r1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <602abc7e-afbe-4862-8885-b349ac4e6b90@r1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4bbbadbe$0$6980$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Apr 2010 23:55:10 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 402a4713.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=i3IlT^6E_QVHigV@eW57PQ4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[^Oic9GWC63UPCY\c7>ejVXLTFfGUoDj\V]J<J8E5Z6dP
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10873
Date: 2010-04-06T23:55:10+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 4/6/10 10:07 AM, Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> On 6 Kwi, 02:38, Robert A Duff<bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com>  wrote:
>
>>> Is there a way to redefine this so one need to only write V(5) ?
>>
>> Not yet.
>>
>> There is a proposal for this for Ada 2012.
>
> Interesting. Is this proposal publicly available?

I guess it is this one:

http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ai05s/ai05-0139-2.txt