From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.150.82 with SMTP id y79mr3082847iod.107.1519969807220; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 21:50:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.3.237 with SMTP id f100mr205596otf.6.1519969806939; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 21:50:06 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!w142no155768ita.0!news-out.google.com!a25ni405itj.0!nntp.google.com!w142no155764ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 21:50:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0ad4875f-b38c-40d0-9271-2af84babf9dc@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.116.179.50; posting-account=z-xFXQkAAABpEOAnT3LViyFXc8dmoW_p NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.116.179.50 References: <0ad4875f-b38c-40d0-9271-2af84babf9dc@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4bab728c-a011-4603-914a-fc96cc4d085a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: any gnoga wins? startups? From: Bojan Bozovic Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 05:50:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 2090 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1300849800 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50784 Date: 2018-03-01T21:50:06-08:00 List-Id: On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 3:16:53 AM UTC+1, polymorph self wrote: > news? Well gnoga, for all what it tries to accomplish, is ahead of it's time. If = you don't provide static page for web crawlers, your site might not be inde= xed at all, and even then, it might be penalized for serving different vers= ions of site to visitors and search engine, but that's not due to flaw in g= noga itself, but due to the fact that web crawlers don't execute javascript= nor use websockets. I suppose Ada AWS or even Ada CGI solution would be mo= re web search engine friendly, and more appropriate for most web sites. Som= e might say that holds true for screen reader programs too, but in this age= it's inexcusable to have web crawler or screen reader not able to process = javascript, yet nobody objects.