From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed1.swip.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:46:06 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Presentations on-line - Ada&SPARK for Education&Research
References: <hmjvj6$orr$1@asgard.cs.kuleuven.be>
 <4b90babf$0$7625$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <hmqi16$5nh$1@news.eternal-september.org>
In-Reply-To: <hmqi16$5nh$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4b90e0ef$0$6723$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Mar 2010 11:46:07 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 1ccc3191.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=Am05IchlTGieoCI^f\Y]EaA9EHlD;3Ycb4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk70:FTW9T94bnc\616M64>jLh>_cHTX3jm@0RoN;NnQCh
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9422
Date: 2010-03-05T11:46:07+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

J-P. Rosen schrieb:
> Georg Bauhaus a écrit :
>> True?  With some effort, it seems possible to break an Ada
>> monitor implemented as a protected object.
>>
> With enough pointers, you can make anything unreliable ;-), but the
> important point in your remark is "with some effort". If you make a
> special effort to publicly export something that is meant to be
> protected, it ceases to be protected. But this can happen only if the
> author of the PO provides facility for doing that; it cannot happen due
> to misuse on the client side.

Thanks, this is wording I had been looking for.