From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8ade73c17347d621,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsfeeder.ewetel.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:16:08 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Temporary variables Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4b676ec8$0$7622$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Feb 2010 01:16:08 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 76b5c84a.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=LAJH6N``WV=nBOkdL^Lo7>ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2RL`mA6GinL=BhmZ Recently, more and more WWW writers writing about programming seem to prefer the phrase "temporal variable" to "temporary variable", for exmple, in the Ada wikibook. I don't know English well, but I had thought (and have checked) that "temporal" is not the same as "temporary". It is either (a) "temporal", the opposite of "spiritual" (that which is not eternal like the spirit, but physical), or (b) an adjective next to dimension as in "temporal and spatial dimensions of the universe", or (c) referring to temple, a word of cranial anatomy. See the "temporal line" in http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/physiognomy/cranium.jsp Translations of "temporary" into the dialects of Latin do not seem to justify "temporal" for "temporary" either. On the contrary. Neither do these sources, AFAICT: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/temporal http://www.wordreference.com/enru/temporary There is also temporal logic which does not seem to focus on temporarily used variables but on the logic of when things are true. Should there be corrections made to the Ada wiki book, then? E.g. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Errors (Where does this use of "temporal" with "variable" come from? It seems wrong, really? Guesswork? Mechanic use of grammar? Or do people start checking the use of phrases with the help of the number of occurrences of the phrase in Google search? If so, Google might leed to an unfortunate self-fulfilling prophecy. (I am guilty of creating misunderstandings myself when trying to speak English but all the more I would not want this to be an excuse for not trying to avoid whatever mistake there is.))