From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.129.71.11 with SMTP id u11mr30102048ywa.11.1448653565300;
        Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:46:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.104.163 with SMTP id gf3mr131256obb.5.1448653565253;
 Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!f78no3575265qge.1!news-out.google.com!f6ni14135igq.0!nntp.google.com!mv3no5513483igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:46:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <834c6afa-870e-4921-a1f1-4fe2b061811a@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=153.181.129.1;
 posting-account=Mi71UQoAAACnFhXo1NVxPlurinchtkIj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.181.129.1
References: <0c524381-442a-49cc-9d72-27a654320153@googlegroups.com>
 <073bed9a-32f2-4045-93ec-064322edf883@googlegroups.com>
 <834c6afa-870e-4921-a1f1-4fe2b061811a@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4b393c0a-e4cb-46b4-b55c-caf5c2d9a5ae@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Two approaches of iterators for the key-value pairs
From: ytomino <aghia05@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:46:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Received-Bytes: 1789
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4020219898
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28572
Date: 2015-11-27T11:46:04-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > So the question really is, if we add Ada 2012 Iterator support to Ada.Directories and/or Ada.Environment_Variables, should the design be to 
> > expose just an Iterator type, or both an Iterator Type, and an Iterable container type?
> > 
> > My thought is that the latter might be better mostly because it would be more consistent with the other standard container types, but I could go either way.

Oh, I think the latter might be better for *Ada.Directories*, too, because its element (Directory_Entry_Type) is not the key-value pair.