From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.221.137 with SMTP id qe9mr36867815pac.4.1388754400137; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 05:06:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.16.168 with SMTP id h8mr1097026qed.2.1388754400067; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 05:06:40 -0800 (PST) Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!a5no3552722pbg.1!news-out.google.com!p7ni4991qat.0!nntp.google.com!p15no57287264qaj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:06:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6ae2f376-796c-4464-ade8-b0aff1511dc4@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:690:2200:9aa1:34ee:1ed4:93db:5f1; posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:690:2200:9aa1:34ee:1ed4:93db:5f1 References: <55816b0e-be77-4b54-9500-fd15b663e2a1@googlegroups.com> <55f15950-f3db-4e14-b5ee-c1696f930947@googlegroups.com> <524276de$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <47264cd9-9d85-4a75-8163-6cdf52dcb97f@googlegroups.com> <20140102200415.080b3e99@vostro> <6ae2f376-796c-4464-ade8-b0aff1511dc4@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4ae482af-efe9-448b-b18b-6d1ca7043b62@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: SDL Bindings? From: Marius Amado-Alves Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:06:40 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Bytes: 2055 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:184342 Date: 2014-01-03T05:06:39-08:00 List-Id: > Yes, the dump-ada-spec function. Trying that now. Seems to work. It doesn't. The result does not compile (I was tricked into thinking it did= by GPS somehow). The generated code is illegal. A few faults I could solve= by hand. But there are circular dependencies (winnt <--> windef) and other= hard or impossible to solve faults. It might be useful for discovering the mangled names.