From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:58:49 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= <"tl at ada-dk.org"> Organization: Ada DK User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada.Command_Line.Argument_Count question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <4ab00009$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.91.213.86 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=N`^eGGo5I@B?ZCK:;haR=OYSB=nbEKnkKLjXPCMh]fEM9HanD:b=JLA=UiO>Z:P6OCaX>>FJ?M`3Hn7nLcH7K0`N0n?IogZ\jkC X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8333 Date: 2009-09-15T22:58:49+02:00 List-Id: The RM has this to say about Argument_Count: "If the external execution environment supports passing arguments to a program, then Argument_Count returns the number of arguments passed to the program invoking the function. Otherwise it returns 0. The meaning of �number of arguments� is implementation defined." I'm wondering what that last sentence mean? Is the RM trying to tell me that Argument_Count cannot be trusted to yield the same result on different systems (Unix, BSD, Windows, Linux and so on)? Or am I missing the point? -- Regards, Thomas L�cke Email: tl at ada-dk.org Web: http:ada-dk.org IRC nick: ThomasLocke