From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3a6a9f1d654285ba X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:24:51 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Shootout program for K-Nucleotide (patches) References: <4a743343$0$32674$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <3f9f9e21-e088-4fbe-baac-dd43fdf6b911@r38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4a757b0d$0$31328$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4a9fc85a$0$2850$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <4a9fe08e$0$32680$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: <4a9fe08e$0$32680$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4aa06c65$0$32667$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Sep 2009 03:24:53 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 6d78e750.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=I=fj8Wn8RTDE4ZB2flKORAA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbI@3CKQ\5Q69AA:ho7QcPOVCjJgRn5Q:7XHHAl`db?=7R@ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8141 Date: 2009-09-04T03:24:53+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > If all goes well I will put a new multitasking > version at the given address later this evening. It went almost well. Here is a new single tasking version which incorporates many if not all of the latest patches, including a new Line_IO. Interesting to play with, for example, is Bytes_Per_Word : constant := ? ; in KNucleotide's String_Fragments, where ? = 4 or ? = 8. Seems to make a difference in some environments. To see for yourself you would need these sources: http://home.arcor.de/bauhaus/Ada/knucleotide.single.gnat http://home.arcor.de/bauhaus/Ada/line_io.ada (The final Line_IO for K-Nucleotide will be with a null Write implementation only as Write isn't used. Should be a few lines shorter, then.)