From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FREEMAIL_REPLY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d575f572a099528
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-13 16:36:38 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: wv9557@yahoo.com (Will)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is faster Ada or C?
Date: 13 Dec 2001 16:36:37 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <4a885870.0112131636.227e2521@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.1007448966.30275.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <9ujh51$k6m$1@wanadoo.fr> <3C0EF345.47BCC09@adaworks.com>
 <568ede3c.0112071202.56fc9f@posting.google.com>
 <3C13BC4A.1C1EBE8B@adaworks.com>
 <568ede3c.0112110814.1c31fd91@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.173.190.124
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1008290198 7076 127.0.0.1 (14 Dec 2001 00:36:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Dec 2001 00:36:38 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17898
Date: 2001-12-14T00:36:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

hyrosen@mail.com (Hyman Rosen) wrote in message news:<568ede3c.0112110814.1c31fd91@posting.google.com>...
> > Unless something has changed, C++ requires the full definition of the
> > inlined function at the place where it is declared.
> 
> That simply is not true. Just as I posted, the definition of an inline
> function may be separate from its declaration.

actually,
main.cpp:

inline int callme();
main()
{
	callme();
}

test.cpp:

inline int callme()
{
return 0;
}

will not compile. Tested with g++ and Visual C++