From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,da39df064d0b18d7
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:27:20 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT's stack checking in Ubuntu 9.04 (and Shootout regex-dna)
References: <4a776a94$0$31878$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 	<u18g75108pv06pegc2sk971n97fd11gfjk@4ax.com>
 <4a7f1fc5$0$31344$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <9adb4985-582c-4cbf-906c-3afa7dcd31f6@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <9adb4985-582c-4cbf-906c-3afa7dcd31f6@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4a80bae9$0$31866$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Aug 2009 02:27:21 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: fab56d0e.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=M`0j2;X]2cL2jYf>V4L0gLMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbIfZBDGQ5@\3JKQDKiQ7h<gN:E?]Iga\U2DQ6d4UD<_T>M
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7678
Date: 2009-08-11T02:27:21+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

jonathan wrote:
> The first thing I tried worked rather well: I replaced
> 
>    Stack_Size : constant Positive := 2000;
> 
> with
> 
>    Stack_Size : constant Positive := 129;
> 
> in GNAT_spitbol.patterns.

Works here, too, thanks.  Worth a few seconds off 40.
While changing the library is not part of the game,
this is useful in general, I'd think, since the
comment next to Stack_Size invites us to adjust it to
fit a program's needs.

Another way of using modified copies of GNAT library
units seems to be to use -a ; GNAT then considers
the library unit in my source directory.  (There is
probably some risk when the options change from those
used for compiling the library, though.)