From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 5b1e799cdb,3ef3e78eacf6f938
X-Google-Attributes: gid5b1e799cdb,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.velia.net!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:42:33 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.programming
Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3?
References: <h3sln0$rhm$2@news.eternal-september.org>
 <Y_2dnY2f7NnpPvjXnZ2dnUVZ8qOdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <4fc0934e-197b-4a02-a006-4b64072897b2@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <7020ad82-ed09-4c87-8f46-db23bf2fa866@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <q6WdndCZP_u38vTXnZ2dnUVZ8sNi4p2d@brightview.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <q6WdndCZP_u38vTXnZ2dnUVZ8sNi4p2d@brightview.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4a698208$0$32677$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Jul 2009 11:42:32 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ff6f2e38.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=nloRohN3_T9RadXUBHgFh3A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR1^YC2XCjHcb9`K6_UNLbAA0;9OJDO8_SK6NSZ1n^B98i:9U82[i[]TV7
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:408 comp.lang.ada:7311
 comp.lang.modula3:96 comp.programming:12016
Date: 2009-07-24T11:42:32+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jon Harrop schrieb:
> tm wrote:
>> Simplicity of languages and their implementation got lost somehow...
> 
> The F# team at Microsoft used to advertise that their compiler was under
> 10kLOC.
> 

Did they advertise whether their F# compiler did a bit more
than delegate its work to MS's common compilation infrastructure?