From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1592759aa83d0d45 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 01:28:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: maa@liacc.up.pt (=?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A1rio_Amado_Alves?=) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: MI in Ada 200X Date: 30 May 2003 01:28:07 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4a4de33a.0305300028.3cef8526@posting.google.com> References: <0Pxza.699607$OV.652508@rwcrnsc54> <4a4de33a.0305280557.5d5aba37@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.48.153.194 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1054283287 629 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2003 08:28:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 May 2003 08:28:07 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38051 Date: 2003-05-30T08:28:07+00:00 List-Id: Wesley Groleau wrote: > >>Mário Amado Alves wrote: > >>>Everybody wants class MI. The reasons it was left out of Ada 95 and > I don't! Please see my answer in thread "MI in Ada 200X (was: Suggestion for Ada 200x - Interface inheritance)" --MAA