From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.109.12 with SMTP id i12mr35050608ywc.29.1439467777194; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 05:09:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.105.102 with SMTP id b93mr376275qgf.26.1439467777156; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 05:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!69no776963qgi.0!news-out.google.com!78ni9496qge.1!nntp.google.com!69no776962qgi.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 05:09:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79oew82p4v6b$.hkifjb8uma0z$.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.244.247.230; posting-account=yqIeawoAAABjurYCnreG-UEiQLwpDf2R NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.244.247.230 References: <84ecbeb2-095a-4067-a05e-e86ac86d8597@googlegroups.com> <8235925f-3299-48fb-abfe-67b77515e5de@googlegroups.com> <79oew82p4v6b$.hkifjb8uma0z$.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4a4b82b9-f0a2-48af-9da6-255dfaeeaf6f@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: GUI for Ada (GPS with GtkAda or GtkGlade GUI Builder) From: sjaniska@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:09:37 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2089 X-Received-Body-CRC: 814014803 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27438 Date: 2015-08-13T05:09:36-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 1:59:37 PM UTC+2, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > No. Because GUI code is usually bigger and messier than the application > code. It is more fragile and requires much more maintenance. > No. Maintenance costs are 10 times of developing costs. For GUI code it is > even more than that, because once deployed, the customer starts requiring > modifications. Whatever mythical productivity it does not matter in the end > anyway. So, what is solution? Writing everything in Python :-) Isn't the problem that many type-safe languages at the end use e.g. GTK bindings for the library written in unsafe language like C? Or, do you suggest writing everything in e.g. C++? Having, at least, application code written in safe-language, could reduce maintenance cost a bit?