From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c92999d3d36edb6c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.erinye.com!news.swapon.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:55:01 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: MinGW Ada compiler licence question targeting commercial applications References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4a3e1f96$0$32674$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Jun 2009 13:55:02 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: e2927a18.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=JkO@AP?3`mZ5TOT9_N5i Marco wrote: > 2) purchase a less expensive Ada compiler for release of your product > (which you can deduct as a business cost) such as the "Janus/Ada 95 > Personal Edition for Win NT/95" and leave GNAT behind. > > Any other inexpensive Ada for Windows compilers out there? ObjectAda for Windows Core Pack used to be in the Microsoft Pro range. I haven't checked lately, though, but think they will be happy to sell a license if you don't expect 8/5 full support and catering.