From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c89a4b067758a6e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!41g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_(Yannick_Duch=EAne)?="
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free
	grammar ?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <4a29ee44-02b9-456b-a488-24d4f4077de4@41g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <4a448c5c-a4ed-446f-bb8b-67c5ba99927a@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
	<FWLuj.41404$yE1.10867@attbi_s21> <47bbfb5b$1@news.post.ch>
	<37b7e369-01c8-4adf-8d1e-c40fa7e51cea@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
	<9012d70c-8d61-4e2e-9eda-c12d48f1d9e1@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<47bc40e7$0$21890$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
 <cf265246-91c7-4d08-b9d0-05dd91d9ee82@34g2000hsz.googlegroups.com>
	<2b943ca7-7b7e-4bfb-b2b5-bf2818e1e56e@t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
	<fpihab$6bv$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <4b75dce0-668f-48c9-9302-ff67f33bcf31@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
	<fpkubm$fd6$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.94
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1203638057 3599 127.0.0.1 (21 Feb 2008 23:54:17
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:54:17 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 41g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.94;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.23 (Windows NT 5.1; U; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19962
Date: 2008-02-21T15:54:17-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 21 f=E9v, 23:19, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> There are no public links; mostly not until a formal effort to update the
> standard is launched.
That's good, so give a private link... with any valid user name and
any valid password... the guy does not need to know, does he/she ?
(rolling on the floor)

=2E.... I'm curious.... I've said

(dont' hit please)