From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,154ee4f21cce19fa
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder2.news.weretis.net!news1.tnib.de!feed.news.tnib.de!news.tnib.de!newsfeed.teleport-iabg.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:56:22 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: bibtex entry for Ada standards
References: 
 <f7e8d530-65c4-482a-a14c-57adc4cbdebf@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 	<oktSl.28717$d36.25026@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <5559c98b-51fc-4686-9292-891a9774190b@d38g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <5559c98b-51fc-4686-9292-891a9774190b@d38g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4a1acdb6$0$31875$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 May 2009 18:56:22 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7b9f4200.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=9UYbLjoSBQVYQ5E:l<XC@SMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ^YC2XCjHcbYAF3WE5o[9c[;9OJDO8_SKVNSZ1n^B98iZKgD=2:G\MFW
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6001
Date: 2009-05-25T18:56:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

qunying schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for all the input. In this case then, what people normally use
> for their bibtex entry for this kind of standards?
> 
> I could use manual as it does not require a author field, like
> @manual {
>    title="Reference Manual for the Ada Programming Language"
>    organization="Department of Defense"
>    note="ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A"
>    year="1983"
> }
> 
> And better definition?

Some books have similar entries in their list of references,
as have some online publications, typically about languages.
(The Liskov/Wing paper on subtyping, I think.)
These should be reasonably official.