From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f02a96c85b47538d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.0.170 with SMTP id 10mr7562642pbf.2.1320966789109;
        Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:13:09 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h5ni25439pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!193.252.117.184.MISMATCH!feeder.news.orange.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <4EBC5A85.2040807@obry.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:13:09 +0100
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR;
 rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Read Windows login username in Ada 95
References: <9192369.445.1320801564794.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbl36>
 <268750.2183.1320871677246.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqan20>
 <j9esnb$2tv$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <18650574.2609.1320888091484.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqjc16>
 <j9h51i$j0v$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
In-Reply-To: <j9h51i$j0v$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Nov 2011 00:13:08 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.2.58.8
X-Trace: 1320966788 reader.news.orange.fr 2516 90.2.58.8:12843
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Xref: news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:14398
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2011-11-11T00:13:08+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le 10/11/2011 19:26, Jeffrey Carter a �crit :
> On 11/09/2011 06:21 PM, Rego, P. wrote:
>>
>>> Who is responsible for freeing Answer_Ptr?
>>
>> If I included an Free(Answer_Ptr), would it solve this?
>
> I don't know. My question was whether the pointer returned needs to be
> freed by the caller. Moran's response seems to indicate that it does not.

In this case it does not. I agree with Tom.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|    http://www.obry.net  -  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B