From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!193.252.117.184.MISMATCH!feeder.news.orange.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <4D51794B.3040806@obry.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:11:39 +0100
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR;
 rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <31c357bd-c8dc-4583-a454-86d9c579e5f4@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <05a3673e-fb97-449c-94ed-1139eb085c32@x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <iimmvm$tsp$1@news.eternal-september.org> <8r86vgFc3uU1@mid.individual.net>
 <iimrem$udn$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <19fh1chm74f9.11cws0j5bckze.dlg@40tude.net>
 <fa33fca1-c95b-4558-8a4c-7b3276366ffc@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d4ff70e$0$6886$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <737a6396-72bd-4a1e-8895-7d50f287960e@d28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <eda00084-fcc3-416c-bd3e-8b9e9c1a4b40@o13g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5110ea$0$7669$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <4d5110ea$0$7669$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Feb 2011 18:11:39 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.124.203.119
X-Trace: 1297185099 reader.news.orange.fr 32424 82.124.203.119:10226
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17001
Date: 2011-02-08T18:11:39+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le 08/02/2011 10:46, Georg Bauhaus a �crit :
> As Hyman said, there are tons of well working C programs out there,
> very likely using some int i, plus increment or decrement.

Sure, I agree 100% with you. The question what was the cost to have the
code running fine? We can also see many assembly code running fine, what
what the cost per line?

I'm not a guy having fun playing with a language that want to kill me or
empty my pocket because I need to spend energy on intrinsic problems. I
want to concentrate to my application domain not to C/C++ idiosyncrasy!

So for what it's worth I agree 100% with Ludovic. I too see bugs in
every C line of code...

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|    http://www.obry.net  -  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B