From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a996db867563769d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!feeder.news.orange.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <4D0F79F2.4040107@obry.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:44:50 +0100
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR;
 rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: Kulin Remailer <remailer@reece.net.au>
Subject: Re: A few questions on Ada and Ada implementations
References: <82ei9dstls.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <MWEJTBHF40532.9783449074@reece.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <MWEJTBHF40532.9783449074@reece.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Dec 2010 16:44:51 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.2.10.197
X-Trace: 1292859891 reader.news.orange.fr 32440 90.2.10.197:7785
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17036
Date: 2010-12-20T16:44:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le 20/12/2010 16:28, Kulin Remailer a écrit :
> I meant just as I wrote, free of license restrictions, not free as in
> no-cost, as the rest of my message showed. I didn't expect anything in the
> public domain would meet my needs. If you read my post I'm sure you realize
> that, so it would seem you're just taking issue with one statement, out of
> context, with an eye towards proseletyzing (did I spell that right) on your
                               proselytizing
> Church of "free software". Don't waste your time on me, I know better!

Ok, but why ask if you know better? Stephen response was quite sensible
if you asked me. Now you can probably describe the license you are after
since you know better... In any case I can't help you as now I'm quite
confuse about your question!

> The GPL is most certainly not designed to insure freedom, it's designed to
> enforce their ideas of software as a socialist enterprise. To the extent
> that otherwise sensible people consider viral, forcible open source
> licenses freedom, they've been somewhat successful ;-) Just because they
> redefine words whose meaning is not in question and repeat those falsehoods
> endlessly doesn't mean we are all silly enough to buy their bill of goods.

Please do not play troll here. Thanks.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|    http://www.obry.net  -  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B