From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: fac41,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1008e3,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 108717,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gide91fe56a56,gida07f3367d7,gid8d81cdf253,gid5b1e799cdb,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.pascal,comp.programming Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:12:23 +0100 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: <4BA8F677.3090206@adalog.fr> References: <4BA8BA91.4050905@cherrystonesoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org; logging-data="24754"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/wTOuHxN1oHdNrNiB0syR" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) In-Reply-To: <4BA8BA91.4050905@cherrystonesoftware.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:HhVtm/r24UU5ErkLa0rL6C1cnyQ= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:518 comp.lang.ada:9701 comp.lang.modula3:138 comp.programming:14637 Date: 2010-03-23T18:12:23+01:00 List-Id: balson a écrit : > IOW, stay away from the likes of Java, C#, Pascal. Unless you have a > very specific reason for going in that direction. Your performance will > suffer. > I don't see why you put Pascal in the same basket. Pascal is not part of the benchmark, therefore there is no evidence for what you say, and Pascal does not require an interpreter or semi-interpreter. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr