From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3737542e2ed2b8e1 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:05:44 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem with optimizations References: <49f73730$0$2850$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <49f753b9$0$2861$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <49f7fc49$0$32671$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Apr 2009 09:05:45 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 63217d8d.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC==d6?hNJGf7MC4i^e1BZ=_HA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbI19?[;VGd>JD;9OJDO8_SKFNSZ1n^B98iJkkaBPlkiXeO X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5607 Date: 2009-04-29T09:05:45+02:00 List-Id: (see below) schrieb: > On 29/04/2009 03:35, in article > fbc5b194-ff66-422f-a163-a8b38b93f20c@a5g2000pre.googlegroups.com, "Gene" > wrote: > >> On Apr 28, 3:12 pm, "(see below)" wrote: >>> On 28/04/2009 20:06, in article 49f753b9$0$2861$ba620...@news.skynet.be, >>> >>> "Olivier Scalbert" wrote: >>>> So an Ada compiler can compile incorrect programs ! >>>> ;-) >>> It has no alternative, thanks to Turing. >>> 8-) | 8-( >>> >>> -- >>> Bill >>> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain >>> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." David Brooks- Hide >>> quoted text - >> Well... Thanks to God and/or nature, wherein Turing had some insight... > > Indeed, it's thanks to Turing (et al.) that we can allow compilers to err, > and do not in ignorance demand an unattainable perfection. So I should like to tell my superior powers.