From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a81289725302b2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:58:17 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Distro with the best Ada development environment?
References: <_t8Fl.24641$Ws1.11326@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <gs363t$og2$1@ccpntc8.in2p3.fr>
 <14bfe62d-d121-4f44-8d05-7a542c3d008b@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <49e5a8e9$0$30232$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <cacde80f-05d1-4cee-bae8-b9c31e0e0adf@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <49e782da$0$31871$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <74rfnoF152obcU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <74rfnoF152obcU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <49e89909$0$31333$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Apr 2009 16:58:17 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: f11cff5e.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=9Zkkn5_]:YOj7E:bke<5HF4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbI_0@4X\RS2=K;9OJDO8_SKFNSZ1n^B98iJ[iH[CP[GHAB
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5489
Date: 2009-04-17T16:58:17+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Alex R. Mosteo schrieb:
> Georg Bauhaus wrote:

>> The spark program SEGFAULTs when run on Debian 5 AMD64 stable.
>> I used valgrind to look into this and inspecting the output
>> of valgrind made me think I should set a higher stack size limit.
>> I did, and the symptom went away. (The default stack size is 8192.)
> 
> Did you use -fstack-check? Without it, it's normal to get violations instead 
> of Storage_Error. Even with it, it's not 100% reliable.

I did not compile the Spark tools ... ;-)