From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-17 13:24:07 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dmytrylavrov@fsmail.net (Dmytry Lavrov)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: += in ada
Date: 17 Oct 2003 13:24:07 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <49cbf610.0310171224.102ef4c@posting.google.com>
References: <3F7316F7.219F@mail.ru>
 <49cbf610.0310101231.2358762a@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0310141000.681da5c@posting.google.com>
 <49cbf610.0310150616.3503a1c4@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0310152140.32c77feb@posting.google.com>
 <bmn02h$jev$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <bebbba07.0310161837.7efd9995@posting.google.com>
 <mailman.104.1066359213.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <bebbba07.0310162142.5637b231@posting.google.com>
 <mailman.107.1066389468.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.248.15.98
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066422247 32192 127.0.0.1 (17 Oct 2003 20:24:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1098
Date: 2003-10-17T13:24:07-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

sk <noname@myob.com> wrote in message news:<mailman.107.1066389468.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>...
> Russ <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com>:
> 
>  > ... <snip> ...
> 
> You still havn't provided "REAL" data to establish
> the 98% claim.

But he provided why he think that 98% :

" What I am claiming is that 98% of programmers use them *because*
they are a good idea."

;-)

But new question to Russ is "why did you think that += is a good
idea?"
Russ,please reply to _this_ question, if you can.

Dmytry Lavrov.