From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c193e01cab96e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!fdn.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:18:11 +0100 From: Pascal Obry Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C vs. ada for embeded system References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <49b2ba63$0$17781$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Mar 2009 19:18:11 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.124.16.1 X-Trace: 1236449891 news.orange.fr 17781 82.124.16.1:9894 X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4001 Date: 2009-03-07T19:18:11+01:00 List-Id: abcd a �crit : > why ada is better of "C" language for embeded system? Because Ada has been *designed* to meet criteria needed for embedded and safety-critical systems. To my point of view it has not fails its goal. See also SPARK if safety is just not an option. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net - http://v2p.fr.eu.org --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B