From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,587e0e0a16d65b10
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder4.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng1.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:45:51 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Invade wikipedia!
References: <l6k0og.o0o.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <go4gqp$5nj$1@octagram.motzarella.org> 	<gir5og.o5s.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <go66s6$m76$1@octagram.motzarella.org>
 	<49a6d506$0$32680$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4a18f335-30f6-4216-8376-0310eb560445@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 	<49a7ced2$0$31342$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <t0tq29ariugm.aftb8vcp4aeg$.dlg@40tude.net>
 	<goahsr$qul$1@octagram.motzarella.org> <P%4ql.591174$yE1.352310@attbi_s21>
 <a2261439-4325-4df2-9664-3f49fbf5cdcb@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <a2261439-4325-4df2-9664-3f49fbf5cdcb@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <49a923f5$0$32681$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2009 12:45:57 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: e2e82190.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=IfbW2=0KeSDgj[ZPFj7ehOA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbI>EHjJZ1ZB_BA:ho7QcPOVCm>CHHjcW02F?8`O^Ti83YD
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4818
Date: 2009-02-28T12:45:57+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne) wrote:

> If you have multiple loops nested loop, you may wish to use named
> loop, as in
> 
> Label1: loop
>    ....
>    do the stuff
>    Label2: loop
>       ...
>       do the other inner stuff
>       ...
>    exit Label2 when ConditionA;
>       ...
> exit Label1 when ConditionB;
>       ...
>    end loop Label2;
>    ...

To me, this indentation conveys contradictory information
at this point. I have already switched context to the
outer loop when the indentation of the "exit Label1" is back
to Label1's block level (of loop/end loop) even though
the outdented statement "belongs" to the inner loop.