From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,587e0e0a16d65b10 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!bolzen.all.de!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:13:51 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Invade wikipedia! References: <1tw8gryqdolal$.1osqedj9x821c.dlg@40tude.net> <5c44eaae-631d-46d2-8384-86af79d5e048@n20g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <944a1924-0fa7-487f-a94d-084a2be1b231@v31g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9f2553d3-66f5-4708-a237-bfef1d8404f4@v42g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4013d6a4-f4f4-4d6e-92bd-161687608db9@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <49a58a60$0$30235$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Feb 2009 19:13:52 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: cf8fd0c7.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=jRV9?R=\377L2C_`koXfC5ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1^YC2XCjHcb9K@IAnBOcfk8;9OJDO8_SK6NSZ1n^B98i:Wdc7mA1`dV< X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4766 Date: 2009-02-25T19:13:52+01:00 List-Id: (see below) schrieb: > On 25/02/2009 08:59, in article > 4013d6a4-f4f4-4d6e-92bd-161687608db9@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, "Hibou57 > (Yannick Duch�ne)" wrote: >> If comments are dangerous, so the human though which drives the >> application developpement (or order it), is as much dangerous. > > True, but the compiler checks the human (through their code). > It does not check the comments. All the more we could profit from pre/post assertions and invariant type constraints specified by the programmer. Perfectly clear, checkable, and international. Doesn't someone have the ressouces to help Randy Brukardt continue his work on these? Please! :-) :-) :-)