From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d11f34ffcc6fab86 X-Google-Thread: 10ad19,d11f34ffcc6fab86 X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,d11f34ffcc6fab86 X-Google-Thread: 11440e,d11f34ffcc6fab86 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid10ad19,gid1094ba,gid11440e,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!flph200.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flph199.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!8d753474!not-for-mail Message-ID: <498890E1.9010307@gmail.com> From: Phlip User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.awk,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ruby Subject: Re: new to group - is there a FAQ? References: <6urhanFghp2kU1@mid.individual.net> In-Reply-To: <6urhanFghp2kU1@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.165.47.100 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com 1233686761 ST000 70.165.47.100 (Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:46:01 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:46:01 EST Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: [[OSCZWD\BRMQWH[^BCBNWX@RJ_XPDLMN@GZ_GYO^BVNDQUBLNTC@AWZWDXZXQ[K\FFSKCVM@F_N_DOBWVWG__LG@VVOIPLIGX\\BU_B@\P\PFX\B[APHTWAHDCKJF^NHD[YJAZMCY_CWG[SX\Y]^KC\HSZRWSWKGAY_PC[BQ[BXAS\F\\@DMTLFZFUE@\VL Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:45:53 -0800 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4523 comp.lang.awk:2192 comp.lang.fortran:11630 comp.lang.ruby:33106 Date: 2009-02-03T10:45:53-08:00 List-Id: Default User wrote: > Phlip wrote: > >> What's wrong with Google?? The first hit for [Ruby FAQ] looks >> maintained... > > The message you replied to was an effort to disrupt comp.lang.c. It was > heavily cross-posted (I've restored those) and the follow-ups set to > CLC. Sorry - noticed that after post. I will add the technique to my mental filters! (Not that comp.lang.c is especially susceptible to disruption..? VBGDRC!)