From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d679dd7e9c16805a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!newsreader2.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-hp2.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:37:33 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Selective suppression of warnings --- gnat on GNU/Linux
References: 
 <7a6baa71-80e8-4f3a-80b6-34935bda2fc0@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <C57FAFFE.106303%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <C57FAFFE.106303%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <495a0802$0$32677$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Dec 2008 12:37:38 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: fc313aca.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=6Ej0=EV]NI_1`E>oC;JXEZA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ^YC2XCjHcbY`K6_UNLbAAPA:ho7QcPOVSe`cDl?o>2=T`f\mIhP5o0_
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4093
Date: 2008-12-30T12:37:38+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

(see below) wrote:

> No, the problem is that the Pascal subrange type declarations have been
> wrongly translated. The Pascal declaration:
> 
>   type  somerange = 1..10;
> 
> Means, in Ada:
> 
>    SUBtype  somerange is Integer range 1..10;
> 
> Make this change and the Ada type compatibility problems will magically
> vanish.

I can see this is formally true, but wouldn't you loose
the valuable distinction that comes from different numeric
types?