From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d54559bde05f5bb8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!151.189.20.20.MISMATCH!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:46:04 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Weird string I/O problem
References: 
 <c6f5748b-923f-4077-b33e-a5017309ac46@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 	<d74c1eb0-676f-43c5-85f4-de82b4c9e581@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 	<DiFZk.53517$_Y1.42261@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 	<fe34578b-07af-46b3-aff7-538e16b08fb1@d23g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <af3f14d6-8c00-4402-823e-40fe765fb129@o2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <af3f14d6-8c00-4402-823e-40fe765fb129@o2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <493798d4$0$32671$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Dec 2008 09:46:12 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4ffe2450.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=E=]MNMokOL8^8FBo0_81f>A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR1^YC2XCjHcb919?[;VGd>J4A:ho7QcPOV3BOZ[oAI9;M3`RQW5e;TNV=
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3840
Date: 2008-12-04T09:46:12+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> On Dec 4, 8:31 am, christoph.gr...@eurocopter.com wrote:
>> A nice attitude: If someone finds a bug, omission, wrong RM
>> interpretation, etc in his lengthy and often gratuitous code samples,
>> it's just because "You do not give the complete code."
> 
> Or maybe because anon's code has been reviewed and used by so many
> people there can't be any bugs left in it :)

Loophole rhetorics employed to maintain face? To be honest,
who is not guilty of it?
Hopefully, we can tag these discussions by using email addresses
like anon-2@anon-2.org  (or, talking@parrot.org if someone has
the guts to do that)  when answering.