From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b7d3a51d0d8b6ee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!feeder4.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-hp2.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:08:06 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Extending discriminant types
References: <20081115101632.5f98c596@cube.tz.axivion.com>
 <20081122011825.5354d1c1@cube.tz.axivion.com>
 <vF4Wk.149868$Mh5.87085@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <4928ecad$0$32681$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <648Wk.39330$_Y1.32087@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
In-Reply-To: <648Wk.39330$_Y1.32087@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <492a7d07$0$30236$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Nov 2008 11:08:07 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9c9c965d.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=KnZbXJJPjhk>jlK2>IgHGdic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa^YC2XCjHcbihDM9OmT[e>l;9OJDO8_SKfNSZ1n^B98ij>gSn8ja?TKg
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2770
Date: 2008-11-24T11:08:07+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anon schrieb:
> Georg Bauhaus
> 
> Actually on the 20th you stated this:
> 
> quote:
>   GNAT has -gnat83 as well, but rejects, too, because there are
>   neither tagged nor abstract types in Ada 83.
> unquote:

As I stated in parts missing from your quote, the compiler
rejects. But it rejects because of the presence of "tagged"
and "abstract", as it should. Not becuase of 'Base.

Again, this is easiest to see by actually trying the code
with any of the mentioned editions of GNAT, and -gnat83.