From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ee887b7593f7961b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews3.readnews.com!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:09:21 -0500 From: "Peter C. Chapin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada OS based on Minix3 References: <4919431e$1@news.post.ch> In-Reply-To: <4919431e$1@news.post.ch> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <491967de$0$32371$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> Organization: SoVerNet (sover.net) NNTP-Posting-Host: 1e2315c9.news.sover.net X-Trace: DXC=j72Y]X\ X-Complaints-To: abuse@sover.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2649 Date: 2008-11-11T06:09:21-05:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > Now, if I wanted to create an OS I would not target real hardware at > all. At least not in the beginning. I would probably implement the OS > inside a VMware virtual machine. What about targeting a hypervisor like Xen? If I understand correctly (and I may not) that would separate the OS somewhat from the real hardware and may help its portability in the long run. Peter