From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ee887b7593f7961b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.n-ix.net!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:18:58 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada OS based on Minix3 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <49180a93$0$31346$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Nov 2008 11:18:59 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 7ca74ff9.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=A=1Kn^hoBhkEB;5>eE0T7m4IUK Ivan Levashew schrieb: > Two general problems of starting an enterprise Ada project are as > follows: > Lack of libraries > Lack of developers > > While you can do little about the second, you can at least do binding > generators. Bindings work in a practical sense but they can only perpetuate the lack of integration at another level, the level of objects. I understand there are at least these approaches: - CORBA and the like - .NET style type libraries - OO ABI integration What these approaches have in common could be condensed into some sort of pragma Abstract_Machine, in the sense of the B method.