From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe0da28a190b761 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!83.80.28.12.MISMATCH!multikabel.net!newsfeed10.multikabel.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-hp2.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:28:14 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Storage management References: <87fxmbog1u.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87abciurrl.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <13hpf6ht4tl2m$.1su6rgr67eb2o$.dlg@40tude.net> <49140215$0$23600$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> <1pqpgcv6v4qxq$.1wkkgkw2yncf.dlg@40tude.net> <49142285$0$23584$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4914426e$0$30221$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Nov 2008 14:28:14 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 6995e52f.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=61aQ7RO06aRf8j24CD<3lPic==]BZ:af^4Fo<]lROoRQ^YC2XCjHcbYaFPj0KE8T^Z;9OJDO8_SKVNSZ1n^B98iZJ_kN[2Jd6VP X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8343 Date: 2008-11-07T14:28:14+01:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov schrieb: > There is no way Ada could abort I/O if the OS does not allow this. Second > to Get_Line, or likely the first wanted case is canceling blocking socket > read. I would give 98% that it never will work with ATC. OK, yet, does there have to be an operating system that dictates how the Ada runtime does or does not abort I/O? :-)