From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,682c6a4dc0495d48 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:17:45 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Yes it is possible. Re: Stackusage at runtime References: <058e7ef3-2160-4134-9657-62ac194e6e45@s9g2000prm.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4912c449$0$31344$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Nov 2008 11:17:45 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: e549a93f.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=56L]0NkDlGJFJ3]dH>I?oE4IUKaE X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2595 Date: 2008-11-06T11:17:45+01:00 List-Id: anon schrieb: > There was no confusion except your a fake that thinks he knows Ada. I am not > sure how you became Debian Ada maintainer. And that was the saddest day in > Debian history! Hmm.... Is this a spoof of SNL, maybe? The Chris Farley Ada Show is back! Senator Debian doesn't seem to understand. Could you comment on the Anon doctrine? > In <058e7ef3-2160-4134-9657-62ac194e6e45@s9g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, Ludovic Brenta writes: >> anon wrote: >>> But Ludovic Brenta is quick at doing nothing but cutting people down! >> Oh I don't have to cut you down. You do that yourself very well. >> However, someone had to clear up the confusion you created by mixing >> up stack and heap. Someone might have read your answer and been >> misled. >> >>> Even if Brenta does not understand, >> I do understand. Your answer was wrong because you did not understand >> the OP's question. Do you understand *that* now? >> >>> also I see Ludovic Brenta had no answer to give. >> I had not only one but two answers to give. Niklas Holsti and Stuart, >> respectively, gave them before I did, so I did not repeat them. See? I >> actually read threads before I reply. Apparently you fail to >> understand *that*, too. >> >>> So Ludovic Brenta should get back and fix Annex -E for Debian and let >>> people help those who need it. >> Ludovic Brenta should *nothing*; you seem to fail to understand >> *that*, too. If you need Annex E for Debian, fix it yourself. >> >> -- >> Ludovic Brenta. > -- -- Georg Bauhaus Y A Time Drain http://www.9toX.de