From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e045a5e739e2c80
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr4763307pbb.2.1330332059741;
        Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni14505pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Re=Fun_with_History why_wasnt_Ada83_object_oriented
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:41:04 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <48f0kkgqn425$.10f32rcgipa9g$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <15362655.665.1330003793505.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbox6>
 <ji8vlq$5d3$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <7034d83a-698b-42fa-b13f-31461ed6e50e@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <jieovf$o5i$1@speranza.aioe.org> <op.wabkbvp8ule2fv@douda-yannick>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-27T09:41:04+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:05:45 +0100, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:15:13 +0100, <anon@att.net> a �crit:
>> But the ARG choose Taff's design in 1987 for Ada 95 and for the next 25
>> years Taff has tried to insert Object-oriented features into Ada that was
>> not initially designed for oop. Which has led to more problems with
>> compatibility and maintainability of code.
> The model is still nice,

The model was groundbreaking, the only one consistent with proper typing,
AFAIK. The problem is that it is still not applied to all types as it
should have been. Which is possible to do without compromising either
performance or backward compatibility. 

> OOP is not just what people believes,

But opposition to OO is. Nonsense that there could be OO and non-OO designs
is kept repeated on and on, in comp.lang.ada as well.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de