From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,99e73f65ea2533b9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!62.111.101.3.MISMATCH!news.germany.com!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:40:38 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: and then... (a curiosity) References: <18b41828-bda4-4484-8884-ad62ce1c831d@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <57qdnfULQ9tzKCHVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@comcast.com> <48bd0003$1@news.post.ch> <48bf90bf$0$30032$dbd4d001@news.euronet.nl> <48bffbb7$0$74166$dbd49001@news.euronet.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <48c039bd$0$11086$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Sep 2008 21:40:45 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: de9f2422.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=34TTCZfnGXCC4i^e1BZ=_Hic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRA4nDHegD_]REdOWc^9bL\7MA:ho7QcPOVC1dI0jibnWBMhS^`;Z<\g1I X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1923 Date: 2008-09-04T21:40:45+02:00 List-Id: stefan-lucks@see-the.signature wrote: > 1. If the A- or the B-part in "if A and B" raises an exception, but the > other part is false, the "right thing" (TM) to do would be to transfer > control to the else clause (or below "end if", when there is no else). With all due respect, professor, you are suggesting circumstances could warrant the automatic assignment of value False to expection occurrences?