From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,19924f2facf8443 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.250.MISMATCH!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!postnews3.readnews.com!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:51:37 -0400 From: "Peter C. Chapin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Larger matrices References: <40ed91c2-3dab-4994-9a7b-4032058f0671@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <489a9675$0$20718$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <75a339dd-969b-4c7a-8e89-7b640171bc2f@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <13426f2d-0060-47f0-8139-09506383f648@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <489c2f68$0$1060$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <489c542e$0$12944$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <1d0ueuhuo8z2e.ewzvifms2lau$.dlg@40tude.net> <489c68e1$0$12941$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <1ernhelikct1f$.phk7n6xktz5h.dlg@40tude.net> <489c844b$0$12953$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <1xouarvkb0dop.d7igbk8rqak2.dlg@40tude.net> <489d4afc$0$11736$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <1jkaoww6txsbs.a4rcpuyu464v.dlg@40tude.net> <06d4e936-3fd2-49cc-983b-8581911e497e@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <06d4e936-3fd2-49cc-983b-8581911e497e@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <48a043e7$0$24531$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> Organization: SoVerNet (sover.net) NNTP-Posting-Host: 180acd81.news.sover.net X-Trace: DXC=[L0`X1ML\X3kL[6Ua@kS53K6_LM2JZB_3WL7SE amado.alves@gmail.com wrote: > I tried 200M first for the Storage_Size. Not enough. Don't know why. > 5000 x 5000 << 200M. BTW the semantical maximum is Integer'Last. 5000 x 5000 = 25 million. But then how large is each matrix element? If each element is 8 bytes your matrix is exactly 200 MB in size. Peter