From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bee08c26af9486d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:17:55 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Learning Ada but missing the basics?
References: 
 <85e95c57-07c3-42eb-b9b9-eac5fd3d0d65@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <319201bf-2ac0-4a36-a713-ca1db0326541@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
 <486B47F8.80704@obry.net> <6d1mm5Fd2k6U1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <6d1mm5Fd2k6U1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <486bb846$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Jul 2008 19:17:58 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0ffb136f.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=8;YZSCo`J3VaoembcbF;DQMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[nJn2oIPGFQRPCY\c7>ejVX]QJ@A20mJVQdJU^iF_POPY
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:986
Date: 2008-07-02T19:17:58+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
> Pascal Obry wrote:

>> You'll see that on those projects the code quality and style is uniform
>> in all the sources. This makes a project easier to maintain by a group
>> of people. No one own (by using weird style for example where other
>> developers do not feel comfortable) a part of the code. This to say that
>> there is no ONE good style but most importantly a style must be
>> followed, uniformity is more important to me.
> 
> In this regard, gnat style switches are truly useful. I find I've added quite a
> few over time to my defaults.

Which ones of the GNAT style switches do you think have greater
influence on your programs' stability and design? The ones
that criticize typographic qualities, or those that comment
on the qualities of the non-white code?


 -- Georg