From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b6209be3587b539c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.223.14 with SMTP id ii14mr3817973qab.3.1352027694594; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:14:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.175.73 with SMTP id by9mr1028392vdc.1.1352027694559; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:14:54 -0800 (PST) Path: gf5ni18188417qab.0!nntp.google.com!c7no5685194qap.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 03:14:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.208.105.56; posting-account=a23u_AkAAAB-Xz81hSqodYsmJRrMwioK NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.208.105.56 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <486472d4-94c8-40a2-a202-2128ceaac1db@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: DDS and Ada From: Oliver Kellogg Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:14:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-11-04T03:14:54-08:00 List-Id: On Friday, June 22, 2007 2:54:33 PM UTC+2, Per Sandberg wrote: > We are in the process of producing a thick Ada2005 binding to DDS the > current plan is to write a binding that resembles of the Java binding > specified by OMG. > And the binding shall only depend on the C libraries for DDS as > specified by OMG. > > Artifacts to be produced: > * IDL to Ada generator > * Support packages for the generated code. > * Bindings as specified by the DDS.idl file. > The current path is to use the idl2Ada specification for corba and > and then tweak the bindings to resemble of the DDS Java interface. > > Are there any other parties that got interests in this direction ??? > > > /Per Hello Per, I realize this is a very late reply to your posting: Is it correct that RTI have integrated your binding effort into their Ada offering? Does your IDL to Ada generator map IDL union to Ada variant record? Thanks, Oliver