From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,34e28efa1a88ae84
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:55:27 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access procedure to pointer
References: <g1gqom$2i5$1@registered.motzarella.org>
 <df53ad53-f1fd-4783-9ea0-9a353a330168@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <483C48B5.9060303@gmail.com> <d6kyupfbpon4$.eloynz2lu01v.dlg@40tude.net>
 <483D209D.5010408@gmail.com> <t7bj1g.qad.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <483D72F0.9090308@gmail.com> <eitj1g.lh8.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <49d0600f-e5cd-4d95-9ca4-1eb25a832437@l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <483DE480.9020208@gmail.com> <ufxrz81h5.fsf@nasa.gov>
 <g20oqm$slv$1@registered.motzarella.org>
In-Reply-To: <g20oqm$slv$1@registered.motzarella.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4843edbf$0$27437$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Jun 2008 14:55:27 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7e5ad48d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=M5gjnSd;Udcg`45cDR8l?o4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRaFl8W>\BH3YbL18MlFS7;Ef;9OJDO8_SKfNSZ1n^B98ij_oOFoB^9nZe
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:515
Date: 2008-06-02T14:55:27+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

S�bastien schrieb:
>> You could read the .ads files. They are well written and concise. I
>> don't see what other form of documentation would be much better. 
> 
> I can and I do, but just because I don't have any choice. Of course Ada 
> is easy to read, but there is no hyperlink navigation, this is quite 
> boring.

Load the sources into your favorite IDE. You will then have
navigation. IMHO  computers can be more helpful at a level
above the file system level.

If you can make good use of AdaCore's GNAT library (which works
with GNAT), it is probably best to ask their support whether
or not they can add separate documentation. OTOH, GNAT is
free software, everyone could contribute his or her thoughts
about the library, its use, or its implementation.

The Ada library is documented elsewhere.
Doesn't a browsing style of learning a library have
its counterpart in a scribbling approach to programming?