From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,78447032bdbeb343
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:14:01 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Proposal: pragma Assumption
References: <30917be5-1446-417c-8a4e-18b2f9a1f420@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <13aa4422-c478-478e-8e33-882508d9d1f8@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <13aa4422-c478-478e-8e33-882508d9d1f8@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <483d2259$0$6611$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 May 2008 11:14:01 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: cc5ee90c.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=A8FM9Fh9_RA2jYf>V4L0gLA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKF8Vh=JL_3>Knc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jMNBTSBh8><kB
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:416
Date: 2008-05-28T11:14:01+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Santiago Urue�a schrieb:
>> So the proposal would be adding to the next Ada revision two new
>> pragmas:
>>
>>   pragma Assumption ([Check =>] boolean_expression[,
>>                      [Message =>] string_expression]);
>>   pragma Assumption_Policy (policy_identifier);   -- Error, Check
>>
> I've been thinking more about it, and probably the compilers should be
> encouraged to choose a long switch name to reduce the chance of
> forgetting to remove that it in the final binary. For example, instead
> of (say) "-gnatap", choose something like "--allow-unimplemented-
> units".

Wouldn't a compilation configuration be a good place
for a partition-wide configuration pragma?
Project files typically have a Debug target and a
Production target.