From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,34e28efa1a88ae84
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!not-for-mail
From: Sebastien Morand <seb.morand@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access procedure to pointer
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:02:24 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <483DE480.9020208@gmail.com>
References: <g1gqom$2i5$1@registered.motzarella.org>
 <df53ad53-f1fd-4783-9ea0-9a353a330168@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 	<483C48B5.9060303@gmail.com> <d6kyupfbpon4$.eloynz2lu01v.dlg@40tude.net>
 	<483D209D.5010408@gmail.com> <t7bj1g.qad.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 	<483D72F0.9090308@gmail.com> <eitj1g.lh8.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <49d0600f-e5cd-4d95-9ca4-1eb25a832437@l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: feeder.motzarella.org
 U2FsdGVkX1//pcuMGNUxWuCp/ZpM3C5loE/hULgB1jWzxS104FShhUFR1KKQUnDnMiWexqe8pGaLnWwoqD9X00Fb1xZ20kp8wC6LsNeVP8DgbN5JfibS8HpWBxy5XQRX7caXa9N4sU0=
X-Complaints-To: Please send complaints to abuse@motzarella.org with full
 headers
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:59:42 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: 
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/Y2g5LgAtfGAcccpXiNx1mjbvsn02KjnM=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iTORCk8cM4h66oGcWpLLaSA5dGM=
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080406)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:437
Date: 2008-05-28T23:02:24+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Right, but the reference manual doesn't say that "interrupts" are
> "Unix signals", even on a Unix-like system, which is to be expected,
> since this is a highly implementation-dependent matter and the RM
> can't be expected to speak on what "interrupts" mean in a particular
> implementation.  So the RM can't be expected to help solve Sebastien's
> problem at all.  I'd think that GNAT documentation *would* give an
> answer to this, but a quick search of the GNAT documentation that I
> found on AdaCore's site didn't say anything about what the
> "interrupts" in Ada.Interrupts refer to.  I may not have been looking
> in the right place, though.  I did find the .ads file that defines the
> Ada.Interrupts.Names spec in GNAT's runtime, and that did make it
> clear that "interrupts" are Unix (or Linux or something) signals.

Completly agree. Actually I'm not so sure I have the right link to the manual 
you all speak about :-)

There is so many packages in my adainclude directory, that make me sick not to 
know what is inside ;-)

Sebastien