From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13c7ec19f3c43155
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 04:04:55 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <see.reply.to@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsho+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080502)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: speed of generic code in Ada (vs Java)
References: 
 <9e9bdae7-5e91-4e0c-b783-1ed72311a733@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 	<2e1de55a-69e5-439e-addc-bde650b4c16a@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 	<87wsluulj4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <24bf14ef-ff0f-4309-88e0-550cd4a0dd9d@p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <24bf14ef-ff0f-4309-88e0-550cd4a0dd9d@p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <482e3d47$0$6552$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2008 04:04:55 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: cdd5597a.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=KeJYD:e_K2gm7>ihJR;B_cMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkTUUbab]\[ClPCY\c7>ejVh`7R<FH_a?H`Me8AJ6Z1a[m
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:137
Date: 2008-05-17T04:04:55+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

jhc0033@gmail.com wrote:

> So, if I write a, say, linear equation solver using generics in Ada,
> and then instantiate it with single precision, double precision,
> complex number single precision and complex number double precision,
> you'd expect it to be as fast as the equivalent non-generic versions?

That's the point.