From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bbcbfbb228d6549
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= <seb.morand@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers.Vectors Update_Element issue
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:21:30 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <482B2DAA.1060009@gmail.com>
References: <g0cj0n$i6o$1@registered.motzarella.org>
 <4bb8bb12-225b-4790-bd12-40ef0b0adeaf@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 	<482AFEAC.3040306@gmail.com>
 <8d5f96c4-9a65-4e99-bc1b-a281a547e213@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: feeder.motzarella.org
 U2FsdGVkX1/mAeB4Upc/tHEeGuRX1RGOVQ4SVDihergzMCNH05P6GGgv5QPb3YIBbqU7mD7e4cczYP+R/DPP5Qf/OzV+f7pgougHAvE2TZz09p4f2/Xvwj5RWh3pVS8LYXIYqdAGnw15kIXGltNbmQ==
X-Complaints-To: Please send complaints to abuse@motzarella.org with full
 headers
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:20:47 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: 
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1999tVY15N8vJSPObb7iu8AaywFj/befPpCvtwNWwyhpA==
Cancel-Lock: sha1:G8D3RxAwk3YGNc79NCI+zmmXlSE=
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:61
Date: 2008-05-14T18:21:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> You can still do this in Ada 2005, but if you do, you would only be
> allowed to pass Proc'Access as a parameter if Proc was a *global*
> procedure (not nested inside any other procedure).  The reason is that
> Update_Element could save Process in some global variable.  Sometimes
> that's what you want---you want to be able to save a procedure access
> and use it later.  But in the actual declaration, the Process
> parameter is of an anonymous access type, which means that you can
> pass an 'Access of any procedure, no matter how nested it is, but
> Update_Element can't save the procedure access in a variable
> anywhere.  Hope that explains things.
                           -- Adam

Yes thank you very much, I got it.

Sebastien