From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2014ae9e627cc20c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!217.173.139.114.MISMATCH!bingo.onlinefix!titan-news!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng2.kpn.DE!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:30:50 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SIGAda coverage in GCN
References: 
 <9e31a707-0773-4391-b87a-2dce2c15d411@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <12ae63ed-eec0-4288-89f4-ff0065006c34@k10g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <12ae63ed-eec0-4288-89f4-ff0065006c34@k10g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4805107d$0$636$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Apr 2008 22:30:53 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 46df1c2f.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=XHIm1lSnZJGWDmlTRbh@=Iic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKiDUd?Tkm9_KjHgMjVGlAYBfa;T@Q^bo;B_X`MMO:eDRN
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20963
Date: 2008-04-15T22:30:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

roderick.chapman@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Apr 14, 3:59 pm, roderick.chap...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> Today's new issue of GCN (athttp://www.gcn.com/print/27_8/46116-1.html)
> 
> Interestingly, this article as just been picked up by SlashDot...

As might have been expected, the article offers a lot to
foster the stereotypes about the expensive language that
drives weapons home; Ada is nothing more than Pascal, and
not a word about the fundamental type system and concurrency
until very late in the game.  So the least interesting remarks
make it to the top. Oh well...