From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0e1d3b3f7c994b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:49:48 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus Reply-To: rm.tsho+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Robert Dewar's great article about the Strengths of Ada over other langauges in multiprocessing! References: <13t4b2kkjem20f3@corp.supernews.com> <89af8399-94fb-42b3-909d-edf3c98d32e5@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <53e0fda7-a536-4899-a115-9d4e137ac698@13g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <13t8avd124kno5c@corp.supernews.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <47d4e81c$0$25511$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Mar 2008 08:49:48 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 7d081491.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=hkk>iGY6b3iZ]763ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1Fl8W>\BH3Y2MG1fobIVTX2A:ho7QcPOV3Jhi1O5AS2N=8K\]6jMhAN1 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20270 Date: 2008-03-10T08:49:48+01:00 List-Id: Ray Blaak wrote: > In fact, in an ideal world I would rather be programming in Lisp/Scheme than > any other language, including Ada. (only (if (not (were it inverted)))) > Even stronger, to me Lisp is the ideal pure > computer science language, one that every other language evolves to emulate > over time :-). Does your ideal world require controlling expression of time and storage?