From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,43f6bd9b498b66d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!212.27.60.9.MISMATCH!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:15:45 +0100 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: default formal parameters in generic declarations References: <9b3bac4d-5ae1-4a1b-a81e-9aa9ae1843e0@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1qlkyebn1yxut$.1r1eauouyt3l8$.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: <1qlkyebn1yxut$.1r1eauouyt3l8$.dlg@40tude.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <47cbdde1$0$11000$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Mar 2008 12:15:45 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: fa470904.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=3Hm@BIZ Dmitry A. Kazakov schrieb: > IMO, it is better (as always) to get rid of generics. Default values of > packages are in fact inheritable interfaces. Thus inheritance should be the > way. I would extend this part of the language rather than generics. > Supposedly, removal of generics will also remove the tags from concrete types? How do you deal with what is now usually a generic swap procedure?