From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c664b94ca589f80f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.space.net!news.m-online.net!not-for-mail From: Erik Baigar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX? Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:26:35 +0100 Organization: (posted via) M-net Telekommunikations GmbH Message-ID: <47CA80DB.F1B873D9@baigar.de> References: <47BC8252.84C89825@baigar.de> <47C50951.507A6E68@baigar.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-82-135-78-186.dynamic.mnet-online.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: svr7.m-online.net 1204456269 25016 82.135.78.186 (2 Mar 2008 11:11:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@m-online.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:11:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP28) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20162 Date: 2008-03-02T11:26:35+01:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Creem wrote: > > Erik Baigar wrote: > > now, but what would be the easiest way if I only want to get > > a window and draw lines within this window? I.e. the only > > thing I need is a command like "draw.line(x1, y1, x2, y2);"? > > GtkAda. > I am currently trying to compile this one... > x11ada is very low level and means you will be spending a lot of time > dealing with expose events. I know since I wrote plain xlib programs years ago. > Motif is a higher level toolkit and not a terrible choice. ...and reasonable fast even on older machines... > GtkAda binds to a somewhat more modern library and 'works' under windows > as well. That is the reason why I do not like this way very much: Code where a major part of development is done for the Windows operating system is usually not easy to compile on UNIX machines: Poor makefiles, HUGE amount of dependencies, often not easy to have two different versions of a library on a system due to the use of identical file names for both versions (common "newer DLL replaced older one" on Windows PCs). > Under Linux/Solaris/unix like machines where it is supported it is very > good. gtk-1.0 is OK regarding speed, but recently I recomiled a program with 2.2 and now it runs at 30% the speed of version gtk-1.2. Anyhow GtkAda-1.2.12 is based on 1.2, so I will give this one a try... > The downside will be that for older Solaris and probably for IRIX > you will almost certainly have to compile your own Gtk libraries (not > just the Ada part -- the libraries themselves). I know, just started this journey with libart_lgpl-1.2... ...will post the end of the story in the future, ...thanks so far, Erik.