From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site petsd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!petsd!joe
From: joe@petsd.UUCP (Joe Orost)
Newsgroups: net.ai,net.lang.lisp,net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fortran better than Lisp for numerical code?
Message-ID: <474@petsd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 21-Mar-85 21:10:29 EST
Article-I.D.: petsd.474
Posted: Thu Mar 21 21:10:29 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Mar-85 00:36:42 EST
References: <253@bu-cs.UUCP> <320@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <3829@mit-eddie.UUCP> <537@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Reply-To: joe@petsd.UUCP (Joseph M. Orost)
Followup-To: net.ai,net.lang.lisp
Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG, Tinton Falls, N.J.
Xref: watmath net.ai:2654 net.lang.lisp:412 net.lang.ada:251
Summary: Get this out of net.lang.ada
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Could we PLEASE keep the Fortran vs. Lisp debate out of net.lang.ada.  It
has nothing to do with Ada!
--joe