From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,170b136bef612224 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Received: by 10.68.112.65 with SMTP id io1mr5422864pbb.6.1367665370966; Sat, 04 May 2013 04:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Path: ln4ni1321pbb.0!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!nrc-news.nrc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!news.litech.org!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Specifying a target in a GPRBuild project file? Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:11:25 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <46x1rfwm1j8$.oqwp99p2lcdd.dlg@40tude.net> References: <517bd35b$0$6643$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <989258155388777873.634822rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de> <20130428084708.102cbcb6@atmarama.noip.me> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: rHWOzyHApalsT5sEUcbvVQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Received-Bytes: 2237 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2013-04-28T10:11:25+02:00 List-Id: On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:47:08 +0200, Gour wrote: > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:20:58 +0200 > Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote: > >> (deep breath) I fully agree with you about the lack of a standard >> here. The actual state is more Bazaar than Cathedral. I wish there >> was something common here, but there is not, and you have to do with >> it and have to choose either GPRBuild, CMake, Scons or Makefile. > > I'd have need to work on Ada project including 3rd party C lib which has to be > built and then generate Ada bindings for it as well as the rest of the project > with different pacakges written in Ada as well as main GUI part(gtkada or > qtada). 3rd party means that other people are to build the library. I don't trust generated bundings except for very simple cases. Anyway, the best way to manage C libraries is to define an externally built library project and forget about the mess. Gnatmake will do the rest. No C source code in the project. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de